Answer the two thought experiments 'the direction of happiness' and Essay

Answer the cardinal thought experiments the flush of rejoicing and the experience machine. Based on your answers to the thoug - Essay ExampleIn his argument against hedonism, philosopher Robert Nozick used the thought experiments found on the direction of happiness and the experience machine as he attempted to answer this question. The intuitive feeling of hedonism, which is manifested by the belief that joy should be the ultimate purpose of keep, disregards the provisions of a meaningful life. By showing that there are more values to life than happiness, this paper will answer the two thought experiments and discuss what happiness is and whether a happy life is the same thing as a meaningful life. Nozick uses the model of a machine capable of giving people the experience of whatever their desires and pleasures are, which cannot be distinguished from those that can be experienced a routine from such machines. People would have a survival of the fittest to live inside the mach ine and experience all their pleasures or outside in a unhorse degree of pleasure. Under such circumstances, where hedonism would opine that the sole intrinsic value is pleasure, most people would contain to remain plugged in to the experience machine. That would show a preference of a more engaging but less meaningful life than a less harming and more meaningful one. However, accord to the concept of direction of happiness, the amount of happiness in different lives is exactly the same, only that one tends to run upwards with increasing happiness while the other slopes downwards with declining happiness. Mistakenly, people would still choose the life with happiness that slopes upwards. It is a mistaken choice because people still care and are concerned around their connection with reality, and it is the factor that the experience machine lacks. People still want their experiences to develop from reality instead than fantasy even if both feel the same. From this, it can be s aid that what people ultimately prove in life are not merely feelings of pleasure, but also to be in a particular way. Feelings of happiness and pleasure are desirable but not enough. People would want to go beyond the simple experience of doing things and actually do them. Therefore, there are more values than happiness and experiences of doing things. The experiences of the experience machine only limit people to their own man-made realities that are constructed within the bourne of their perceived important values. Although the experiences of reality may be simulated by the experience machine, no conflict is made with deeper and meaningful reality. When one envisages an experience machine and then appreciate that they would not use it, they apprehend that there are other things that matter more than experiences. The definition of happiness provides that it must contain meaning, pleasure and engagement. The part of meaning is in reference to the contribution to a broader caus e while pleasure comprises the part of feeling good. Although a happy life and meaningful life have overlapping aspects, they are basically distinct and a happy life is not necessarily a meaningful one. Happiness may occur as either or both emotional and mental well-being that is characterized by pleasant and positive feelings, which have different meanings to different people because it is quite a subjective matter. It can be a spontaneous feeling caused by positive emotions and last for a moment, as well as a continuous one. The overlap between a happy and meaningful life is mainly manifested by the fact that meaningfulness is among the causal factors